Thread:SkyFanTD/@comment-25708675-20140918141519/@comment-25708675-20140918233333

"I am neutral because some people might godplay so there team can win, but we will see what we can work out"

No, the teams will be scored on realism, if someone godplays obviously can gets less than the others/team. "I oppose as these type of challenge based activities seem too complicated and more story-driven rather than us working on it. Also, if you're going by realistic team logic, than the Pythons will win so many challenges going realistically, since it's a cowboy-based season, and you have a redneck and a farmer on the Pythons. We should just keep it the way it is."

Story driven and logical, the challenges have a logical part, but that would be explained on the roleplay moment, a the redneck, farmer, jock, cree member, whatever you team have isn't going to affect the challenge himself, is roleplaying no godplaying... (Ex: X searchs on the dirt for a clue and mystically from nowhere get the X amount of clues and win is not allowed, i would say: You/team win on the search but by realism you lose).

"Yeah okay I'll come up with some challenge and you guys tell me what you think."

To the moments is a great idea have story-driven roleplays, i took this from an old pokemon roleplay that i was administrator and i use the rule (it was deleted a long time-ago), this roleplaying would improve the rule of: Keep on character, be realistic and more.

ALL IS ABOUT REALISM, REALISM IS LOVE, REALISM IS... LIFE.